tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3020960402708303830.post6864417323527855505..comments2024-03-28T14:53:38.827-04:00Comments on BLCKDGRD: I Look in That One Kind of DwindledUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3020960402708303830.post-53280409109184953242018-11-11T09:36:52.218-05:002018-11-11T09:36:52.218-05:00Jim H - you make excellent points - our host here ...<b>Jim H </b>- you make excellent points - our host here gives insufficient attention to accentuating the positive especially in the political sphere - stuff happens, and will be dealt with - sometimes - once in a while - the situation develops to our* advantage<br /><br />*what you mean 'we', white man?mistah charley, ph.d.https://www.blogger.com/profile/06303695341246058680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3020960402708303830.post-61942762265803164512018-11-10T13:25:52.399-05:002018-11-10T13:25:52.399-05:00Even further C.E.: The D's chose, ran, support...Even further C.E.: The D's chose, ran, supported, canvassed for, organized, mobilized for, and got elected a woman, literally a nobody, to run against Chris Kobach for governorship of Kansas. Kobach, for the ignorant, is the face—if not the architect—of Republican voter suppression theory and tactics, with a personal connection to Trump. She won, humiliating someone everyone thought was an absolute shoo-in in a ruby red state. It wasn't even on the radar of potentially close races. It was a massive victory.<br /><br />So yeah, D's doing nothing about voter suppression. Come the fuck on! I mean, I know you like to ride around on your little 'I hate motherfucking Democrats' hobby horse and select ridiculous rhetorical flourishes from them that confirms that bias (and sure it's funny sometimes, and even telling (less often)), but these are real, tangible, massive, and unignorable gains. It's a generational war being fought on many fronts all at the same time. Another example, here in GA, D's are struggling against an entrenched, corrupt R. absolute power structure (Gov, Leg, Secy State, Atty Gen) reveling in its ability to flaunt conflicts of interest in its own self-interest. There are tons of lawsuits by people other than Palast. D. money and legal talent is literally flying into the state as we speak to combat it. Same in FL an AZ. It's literally infuriating to read her Tweet being cited as authoritative—i.e., as a rhetorical question from which there can be no dispute because the answer is so obvious and so obviously provides yet another reason to hate Democrats. Sorry for the rant.<br /><br />Hate feeds on ignorance and selective outrage.Jim H.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02088100982761595050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3020960402708303830.post-74046063397401756862018-11-09T14:44:30.772-05:002018-11-09T14:44:30.772-05:00Further counter example: The great state of Florid...Further counter example: The great state of Florida just passed a ballot initiative re-enfranchising former felons whose votes were suppressed. But according to Abby, D's are doing nothing about voter suppression. That's such bullshit. Does she think that the Republicans in that state struggled for years to overturn that horrible post-Jim Crow law?<br /><br />Second. When the Republican legislature of Virginia overrode the Dem. governor's bill re-enfranchising former felons, the Dem governor personally signed each and every form to allow these formerly vote-suppressed, mostly minority citizens the right to vote. But according to Abby, Dem leadership has done nothing to combat voter suppression—when literally the Dems have re-enfranchised literally millions of vote-suppressed citizens.<br /><br />That's the problem with people like her making those sorts of arguments: She can tweet that shit and the angry Berniecrats scream about how the Dems are doing nothing and we need a revolution and blah blah blah. To counter her arguments, you have to examine many facts and look at the entire contextual landscape, but by the time you do, she and her ilk have moved on to the next selective outrage. I worry that in retweeting her, you are endorsing this sort of ignorance-peddling.Jim H.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02088100982761595050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3020960402708303830.post-35811102565361840242018-11-09T11:58:38.195-05:002018-11-09T11:58:38.195-05:00Do not be influenced by self-important ignoramuses...Do not be influenced by self-important ignoramuses like Abby Martin who, when presented with evidence that her little hobby-horse theory is woefully inaccurate and ignores much intense years-long struggle by both leadership and base at both state and federal levels to confront and overturn the power structures of one-party state (which btw is where the suppression happens, not in the House—fuckin' idiot) and federal gov'ts, whines well, yeah, but why can't they do more? Why don't they act NOW?<br /><br />My take on the election is that at that crucial state level, it turned back a decades-long effort by the Koch-funded Federalist Society (which I witnessed the birth of when I was in law school) to achieve supermajority of captive one-party rule state govts so they could call a rigged Constitutional Convention to implement Citizens United-type reforms and possible anti-abortion and voter suppression elements into the the constitution itself. The Dems taking back at least 7 governors offices and state leg's this week forestalled that effort. It was a major victory in a battle that's part of a generational war that ignited with the passage of Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts and Nixon's undoing. 2010 was the crucial election for gerrymandering and John Roberts's gutting of the VRA and Citizens United ruling were key victories for the bad guys. So that is the battlefield we are fighting on now. No Dem is a dictator who rules by fiat, and we don't want or need one. But we need to battle on to reverse those losses. It's happening in real time and right in front of our eyes. So, for her to glibly insist nobody's doing anything is just plain stupid. Granted, it makes a good, inciteful (sic) tweet. Just don't be bamboozled because it plays into whatever outrages or grievances Bernie hopes to incite in the Berniecrats to assuage his own craven power lust. Don't be ignorant or short-sighted like people like Abby.Jim H.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02088100982761595050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3020960402708303830.post-89866152037471004812018-11-09T10:21:11.669-05:002018-11-09T10:21:11.669-05:00when i was a stoner my eyes would get very red ind...when i was a stoner my eyes would get very red indeed<br /><br />now i get high on "the real thing" - defined by firesign theatre as a shoe shine, a clean windshield, and a full tank of gasoline <br /><br />i <b>am</b> - or was - <b>a bernie guy</b> - possibly i may read taibbi's interview and express my opinions, which will be worth at least as much as anyone pays me for them<br /><br />as far as "civilizational suicide" goes, once again i express my hope that human adaptability may enable civilization in some sense to continue, even while recognizing the probability of a bottleneck ahead in terms of population - see William R. Catton, Jr.'s books "Overshoot - The Ecological Basis of of Revolutionary Change" and "<b>Bottleneck: Humanity's Impending Impasse</b>" - the paragraph on the back cover of the latter, published in 2009, reads<br /><br /><b>The roots of our time's troubles are ecological, deeper than current economic manifestations. Anguished posterity will call this 21st century 'the bottleneck century.' Occupationally specialized people today are necessarily dependent upon an intricate web of exchange relations. Ultimately self-destructive, that web fosters myopic preoccupations, making us mutually predatory. Even when functioning normally--and not in a collapsed condition, as currently--this system of relations is pervasively dehumanizing. It tempts even the wisest and most civic-minded to favor 'remedial' policies that can worsen the real predicament. A basic trio of disturbing trends--humans having become so numerous, so ravenous, and so short-sighted--has made the nature of today's human prospect far more dire than most policymakers dare acknowledge. Recognition of, and adequate adaptation to, the deteriorating biogeochemical foundations of human life have been impeded, so human societies (even our own) are almost certainly going to act in ways that make an inevitably difficult future unnecessarily worse."<br /><br /><br /><br /></b>mistah charley, ph.d.https://www.blogger.com/profile/06303695341246058680noreply@blogger.com